Marketing Attribution Software

AppsFlyer vs Branch

AppsFlyer and Branch are mobile attribution platforms that credit app installs and in-app conversions to the ads that produced them. AppsFlyer presents itself as a measurement foundation spanning app, web, connected TV and console campaigns, with geo and holdout tests and touchpoint path reports on top. Branch pairs attribution with deep linking, carrying a person from a mobile web page into the right in-app screen. Most choices turn on which problem is bigger: proving lift across app, web, TV and console, or moving web visitors into the app.

AppsFlyer
AppsFlyer

by AppsFlyer

No reviews yet

Pricing: Zero free for owned-media apps; Growth pay as you go at $0.07 per conversion after 12,000 free first-year conversions; Enterprise quoted on request.

AppsFlyer is a mobile attribution and marketing analytics platform for app, web, CTV and console campaigns, priced per conversion rather than per seat.

7 /17 features Full profile
Branch
Branch

by Branch

No reviews yet

Pricing: Basics, Essentials and Enterprise, all quoted by sales; a no-cost trial is available on Basics; no public prices

Branch is mobile attribution and deep linking software for app growth teams, measuring web to app journeys. Every plan is quoted by sales, free trial on Basics.

8 /17 features Full profile

Feature Comparison

Marketing Attribution Software features side-by-side

AppsFlyer
AppsFlyer 7/17 features
Multi-touch attribution models
No
Data-driven attribution
No
Custom attribution models
No
Ad spend import
Yes
CRM revenue matching
Yes
Offline conversion sync to ad platforms
No
Call tracking attribution
No
Form and live chat tracking
No
Cookieless first-party tracking
Yes
Account-level attribution
No
View-through attribution
Yes
Marketing mix modelling
No
Incrementality testing
Yes
Touchpoint path reports
Yes
Warehouse export of touchpoint data
Yes
UTM link builder and mapping
No
E-commerce order import
No
No reviews yet
Branch
Branch 8/17 features
Multi-touch attribution models
Yes
Data-driven attribution
No
Custom attribution models
No
Ad spend import
Yes
CRM revenue matching
No
Offline conversion sync to ad platforms
No
Call tracking attribution
No
Form and live chat tracking
No
Cookieless first-party tracking
Yes
Account-level attribution
No
View-through attribution
Yes
Marketing mix modelling
Yes
Incrementality testing
No
Touchpoint path reports
Yes
Warehouse export of touchpoint data
Yes
UTM link builder and mapping
Yes
E-commerce order import
No
No reviews yet

Pricing

AppsFlyer

Zero free for owned-media apps; Growth pay as you go at $0.07 per conversion after 12,000 free first-year conversions; Enterprise quoted on request.

Branch

Basics, Essentials and Enterprise, all quoted by sales; a no-cost trial is available on Basics; no public prices

Which Should You Choose?

Choose AppsFlyer when console campaigns need measuring beside app, web and connected TV, or when geo and holdout tests defend the remarketing budget, backed by touchpoint path reports. Choose Branch when the website and the app are one funnel and landing a visitor from a mobile web page on the right in-app screen matters as much as crediting the install. Buying differs: AppsFlyer lists a free entry plan for apps on owned media only; Branch quotes every plan through sales, with a trial on its entry tier.

AppsFlyer's case is the width of what it measures. AppsFlyer lists incrementality testing for remarketing campaigns and touchpoint path reports showing the touches before a conversion. OneLink covers deep linking. Reviewers like the interface, the ad-network integrations and the fraud screening. The limits there: fraud protection and data export sold as add-ons, dashboards with a learning curve, reports lagging more than a day, and raw exports that go back only a few months.

Branch's pitch starts at the link. Its deep links survive the hop from browser to app store to app, web-to-app banners turn mobile web traffic into installs, and LinkHub keeps campaign links in one place. Among the features compared here, only Branch lists selectable multi-touch models, cookieless first-party tracking, and marketing mix modelling built on Meta's Robyn. Developers reviewing Branch say deep linking is quick to set up across platforms, marketers call the interface simple, and a few call ad-partner connection simple. Their complaints: support that slows or depends on the plan tier, an interface and setup that take technical knowledge, and links that are hard to edit once created.

Weigh the reviews by date. AppsFlyer's reviews run from 2020 to early 2026, most from mid-2024; they split on support, praised by some and called slow by others, and a few question report accuracy. Branch's reviews run from 2017 to 2024, nearly all older than two years, so they describe an earlier product; the doubts about its analytics depth and accuracy date from 2018 and 2019.

AppsFlyer's customer pages include Sweetgreen, filed under food and drink, which used it for attribution across web and app; the vendor reports a 17% rise in marketing ROI. Branch's include Housing.com, a real estate platform in India by Branch's account, which used deep linking, attribution, web-to-app banners and SKAdNetwork reporting; Branch reports 30% year-over-year lead growth once the team measured mid-funnel events, not installs.

Both vendors publish a sales page comparing the two and document a migration path: AppsFlyer says a typical move takes four to six weeks with both tools running in parallel; Branch says its team supports SDK and server-to-server migration. In a trial, test a tap on a mobile web page landing in the right in-app screen, credited to its campaign.

Explore Each Product

Looking for more options?

Browse all Marketing Attribution Software